How the Board ruled on prostate (non-cancer) claims, 2021–2025

Prostate (non-cancer) (direct service connection)

Direct (began in or was caused by service), or theory not stated in the Board order

17% granted of 377 decided cases (margin of error 13.5–21.1%). 64 granted, 313 denied, 577 sent back to VA (remanded, not decided), 109 dismissed.

Common reasons in denied cases

• The Board denied when the VA examiner found no link, for example because in-service prostate exams were normal despite urinary complaints, and the only other support was the veteran's own belief about the cause. (3 of 7 decisions read; e.g. 22041509, 23003751, A23011699)
• Some claims failed because there was no diagnosed prostate condition; an elevated PSA alone was treated as a lab finding, not a disability. (3 of 7 decisions read; e.g. A22016280, 23004112, 23053222)
• Other claims failed because nothing showed a prostate problem in service: the separation exam was normal, the veteran dated symptoms to after service, or claimed herbicide exposure was not shown and BPH is not on the presumptive list. (3 of 7 decisions read; e.g. 23003751, A23011699, 23035790)

See the full answer, year by year →

Prostate (non-cancer) (exposure claims)

Exposure (e.g. Agent Orange, Camp Lejeune, burn pits)

0% granted of 70 decided cases (margin of error 0.0–5.2%). 0 granted, 70 denied, 136 sent back to VA (remanded, not decided), 4 dismissed.

Common reasons in denied cases

• Most denials turned on exposure: the Board found the record did not show the veteran was actually exposed to herbicides or another toxin, such as no Vietnam service or duties away from a Thai base perimeter. (8 of 13 decisions read; e.g. 24020618, 21048189, A22015309)
• Where exposure was conceded, a reasoned VA opinion went unrebutted; for benign prostate enlargement (BPH), one VA examiner cited a study finding dioxin exposure was linked to a lower BPH risk. (3 of 13 decisions read; e.g. 23010117, 21039007, A21008586)
• The veteran's own belief about the cause was not competent medical evidence, and private opinions lost weight when they gave no rationale or relied on a broad, unproven exposure premise. (5 of 13 decisions read; e.g. 21039007, 23019262, A25026005)

See the full answer, year by year →

Prostate (non-cancer) secondary to any service-connected condition

Secondary (caused or worsened by a service-connected condition)

26.5% granted of 49 decided cases (margin of error 16.2–40.3%). 13 granted, 36 denied, 89 sent back to VA (remanded, not decided), 2 dismissed.

What convinced the Board in granted cases

• The Board gave more weight to a private opinion with a complete rationale based on the veteran's medical history and current medical literature than to VA opinions that offered little explanation. (2 of 4 decisions read, few decisions; e.g. 22017014, 22043390)
• VA opinions against the claim lost weight when they gave no rationale, or did not address medical literature cited by the veteran's doctor or noted by the examiner. (3 of 4 decisions read; e.g. 22053439, 22043390, 22017014)

Common reasons in denied cases

• Well-reasoned VA opinions explained that an enlarged prostate (BPH) is a common age-related condition and that diabetes does not cause or worsen it, and nothing rebutted them. (3 of 7 decisions read; e.g. 21072753, 23027777, 23026985)
• Service records showed no prostate findings and the record held no medical evidence linking the prostate condition to service or a service-connected condition. (2 of 7 decisions read, few decisions; e.g. A24028442, A24002564)
• The Board gave VA examiners' findings more weight than the veteran's statements, including where the veteran's reports were found not credible. (2 of 7 decisions read, few decisions; e.g. 23041703, 21068000)

See the full answer, year by year →