How the Board ruled on dental and jaw (TMJ) claims, 2021–2025

Dental / jaw (direct service connection)

Direct (began in or was caused by service), or theory not stated in the Board order

17.6% granted of 785 decided cases (margin of error 15.1–20.4%). 138 granted, 647 denied, 838 sent back to VA (remanded, not decided), 174 dismissed.

What convinced the Board in granted cases

• The Board gave significant weight to private or treating opinions that explained how the in-service injury or a service-connected condition led to the jaw or dental problem, sometimes citing medical studies. (4 of 8 decisions read; e.g. 21063777, 21054489, A25028734)
• The Board granted TMJ claims when records confirmed an in-service injury or dental surgery and the veteran credibly described jaw popping, locking, or pain ever since. (3 of 8 decisions read; e.g. 21063777, 22004967, 21058851)
• The Board gave no weight to VA opinions that offered no rationale or ignored the veteran's statements, submitted medical articles, and private dentists' opinions. (2 of 8 decisions read, few decisions; e.g. A25002335, 22015561)

Common reasons in denied cases

• Most denials found the problem was not a dental condition VA compensates, such as missing or decayed teeth or gum disease without bone loss or other damage to the jaw. (7 of 12 decisions read; e.g. 21027413, 22045250, A25025711)
• The Board denied when no competent medical opinion linked the condition to service: a private dentist's opinion gave no reasoning, the veteran's belief was not competent, or a thorough VA opinion went unrebutted. (4 of 12 decisions read; e.g. 22045250, A21008219, A21016143)
• The Board denied TMJ or jaw claims when there was no current diagnosis. (2 of 12 decisions read, few decisions; e.g. 24020485, 23000384)

See the full answer, year by year →

Dental / jaw secondary to any service-connected condition

Secondary (caused or worsened by a service-connected condition)

30% granted of 70 decided cases (margin of error 20.5–41.5%). 21 granted, 49 denied, 127 sent back to VA (remanded, not decided), 3 dismissed.

What convinced the Board in granted cases

• The Board granted when an opinion, often from a VA examiner, explained a concrete mechanism: PTSD stress or tinnitus causing grinding, pain medicine or vomiting decaying teeth, or seizure clenching breaking teeth. (6 of 11 decisions read; e.g. 23030393, A21015303, 21055306)
• Negative VA opinions lost weight when they ignored in-service jaw complaints, skipped the teeth actually at issue, contradicted the examiner's own diagnoses, or wrongly said there was no diagnosis. (4 of 11 decisions read; e.g. 21002744, 21027480, A24034708)
• The Board credited the veteran's own reports of teeth grinding, jaw clicking and locking, which are things a person can observe. (4 of 11 decisions read; e.g. 24001748, 21002744, 21025508)

Common reasons in denied cases

• Most denials were not about medical opinions: the Board found no dental or jaw condition that VA pays compensation for, such as tooth decay or enamel loss alone, or no TMJ diagnosis. (7 of 12 decisions read; e.g. A21008523, A24015594, 23025237)
• Several secondary claims failed because the condition said to cause the dental problem, such as PTSD or cancer, was not itself service-connected. (4 of 12 decisions read; e.g. A25027463, A25002889, 23027836)

See the full answer, year by year →

Dental / jaw secondary to PTSD

Secondary (caused or worsened by a service-connected condition)

Small sample: 20 decided cases, too few for a reliable percentage. 8 granted, 12 denied, 22 sent back to VA (remanded, not decided), 2 dismissed.

See the full answer, year by year →