How the Board ruled on arthritis claims, 2021–2025

Arthritis (direct service connection)

Direct (began in or was caused by service), or theory not stated in the Board order

34.9% granted of 564 decided cases (margin of error 31.1–39.0%). 197 granted, 367 denied, 745 sent back to VA (remanded, not decided), 158 dismissed.

What convinced the Board in granted cases

• The Board gave more weight to a private or treating doctor's opinion that reviewed the full record, considered the veteran's account, and gave a complete, logical rationale. (4 of 12 decisions read; e.g. A21009260, A24059089, 24000374)
• VA examiner opinions lost weight when they relied on service records that were silent, ignored the veteran's reports of ongoing pain, or rested on a wrong diagnosis. (5 of 12 decisions read; e.g. A25025847, A24046054, 23011699)
• Credible lay statements about an in-service injury or duty and continuous joint symptoms since service, sometimes with treatment soon after discharge, supported a grant. (7 of 12 decisions read; e.g. 22003840, 21045701, A25025847)

Common reasons in denied cases

• A reasoned VA opinion against a link, often pointing to aging or another condition, went unrebutted because no competent medical opinion supported the claim. (4 of 9 decisions read; e.g. 21042187, 21013132, A24010601)
• Service records were silent and arthritis was first diagnosed decades after service, and later claims of continuous symptoms were not found credible. (4 of 9 decisions read; e.g. 22051734, 23000342, A24027519)
• The veteran's own belief about the cause or the diagnosis was not competent medical evidence; in some cases no arthritis diagnosis, such as rheumatoid arthritis, was confirmed. (4 of 9 decisions read; e.g. A24010601, 21013132, 21061364)

See the full answer, year by year →

Arthritis secondary to any service-connected condition

Secondary (caused or worsened by a service-connected condition)

44.1% granted of 59 decided cases (margin of error 32.2–56.7%). 26 granted, 33 denied, 102 sent back to VA (remanded, not decided), 10 dismissed.

What convinced the Board in granted cases

• The Board granted when a private medical opinion explained the mechanism, usually that a service-connected joint caused an altered gait that put extra strain on another joint, with clear reasoning and supporting data. (5 of 12 decisions read; e.g. A24015538, A25030851, A25039136)
• The Board gave little or no weight to negative VA opinions that relied only on a lack of documented treatment, called the answer speculative without explaining why, or ignored treatment records and the veteran's complaints. (5 of 12 decisions read; e.g. A23015286, 21048120, 22002926)
• The veteran's credible reports of limping or favoring a joint, backed by treatment notes, helped show the link; in one case a VA examiner's own favorable opinion decided it. (4 of 12 decisions read; e.g. 24009725, A24001152, 22002926)

Common reasons in denied cases

• Most denials rested on a thorough VA opinion, based on the file and the veteran's history, that went unrebutted; examiners often found normal aging, natural progression, or family history the more likely cause. (7 of 11 decisions read; e.g. A24061903, 21009217, 22055547)
• The veteran's own belief about the cause was not competent medical evidence, and a private opinion saying a link was only 'possible' was given little weight as speculative and without rationale. (4 of 11 decisions read; e.g. 21004090, 22055547, 21013189)
• Other claims failed because the primary condition was not service-connected, there was no current diagnosis, or no qualifying in-service injury or continuity of symptoms was shown. (4 of 11 decisions read; e.g. A25017770, 21027444, 23000291)

See the full answer, year by year →

Arthritis secondary to knee

Secondary (caused or worsened by a service-connected condition)

Small sample: 14 decided cases, too few for a reliable percentage. 8 granted, 6 denied, 8 sent back to VA (remanded, not decided), 0 dismissed.

See the full answer, year by year →