How the Board ruled on hand and finger claims, 2021–2025

Hand / fingers (direct service connection)

Direct (began in or was caused by service), or theory not stated in the Board order

30.8% granted of 2,587 decided cases (margin of error 29.1–32.7%). 798 granted, 1,789 denied, 3,855 sent back to VA (remanded, not decided), 556 dismissed.

What convinced the Board in granted cases

• The Board discounted negative VA opinions that ignored in-service hand complaints or the veteran's credible account, rested only on missing treatment records, or wrongly required service to be the only cause. (7 of 13 decisions read; e.g. 22003344, 22020469, 23037049)
• Favorable opinions carried weight when they gave a reasoned rationale tied to the veteran's duties or history, cited medical literature, or came from a treating specialist who reviewed the record. (6 of 13 decisions read; e.g. 22001795, 23052381, 22042459)
• The Board accepted credible reports of numbness, pain or injury that began in service and continued, especially when service records showed hand complaints. (6 of 13 decisions read; e.g. 23016320, A24058740, 22003344)

Common reasons in denied cases

• Most denials rested on a reasoned VA opinion against a link, based on the record and examination, with no medical opinion of comparable quality supporting the claim. (7 of 13 decisions read; e.g. 23029463, 21072109, A25030963)
• Claims failed when service records showed no hand injury, the condition was first diagnosed years later, or the veteran's account was inconsistent; his own view of cause was not competent medical evidence. (6 of 13 decisions read; e.g. 21070863, 21011185, 21065242)
• Private opinions or medical articles lost weight when they ignored other risk factors and normal service records, or described general principles without applying them to the veteran. (2 of 13 decisions read, few decisions; e.g. A24008621, 24030886)

See the full answer, year by year →

Hand / fingers (exposure claims)

Exposure (e.g. Agent Orange, Camp Lejeune, burn pits)

13.3% granted of 60 decided cases (margin of error 6.9–24.2%). 8 granted, 52 denied, 121 sent back to VA (remanded, not decided), 2 dismissed.

What convinced the Board in granted cases

• The Board granted when a medical opinion tied the hand condition to a conceded exposure, such as herbicides, and supported it with medical literature. (4 of 8 decisions read; e.g. 21076293, A24000012, A23016624)
• Negative VA opinions lost weight when they gave a bare conclusion, or relied on the lack of treatment records while ignoring the veteran's account of continuous symptoms. (2 of 8 decisions read, few decisions; e.g. 22020563, 21053127)
• Credible veteran accounts of the exposure and of symptoms since service, such as cold exposure or Gulf War hand symptoms, supported grants. (3 of 8 decisions read; e.g. A25027614, A25011001, 21053127)

Common reasons in denied cases

• The Board most often denied because there was no current diagnosed hand disability during the claim. (5 of 14 decisions read; e.g. A21010140, A24070261, 21030491)
• There was no medical evidence linking the hand condition to the exposure; the veteran's own belief was not competent. (4 of 14 decisions read; e.g. 21034205, A21010140, 21052344)
• The claimed exposure was not established, so favorable opinions that assumed it had little weight. (2 of 14 decisions read, few decisions; e.g. 24001947, 21075377)

See the full answer, year by year →

Hand / fingers secondary to any service-connected condition

Secondary (caused or worsened by a service-connected condition)

35.2% granted of 210 decided cases (margin of error 29.1–41.9%). 74 granted, 136 denied, 407 sent back to VA (remanded, not decided), 20 dismissed.

What convinced the Board in granted cases

• Most grants rested on a favorable VA examiner opinion that used an accurate history and explained how the service-connected condition, such as neck radiculopathy, diabetes, or carpal tunnel, caused the hand problem. (5 of 11 decisions read; e.g. A25004392, 23020135, 21054670)
• Negative VA opinions lost weight when they gave no rationale, or offered unexplained reasoning that did not match the medical literature. (2 of 11 decisions read, few decisions; e.g. 23020135, 22002354)
• A private opinion carried the claim when it explained its reasons from an accurate reading of the record, or was the only opinion on causation. (2 of 11 decisions read, few decisions; e.g. 21011038, A23025088)

Common reasons in denied cases

• The Board denied when no medical evidence linked the hand condition to service or a service-connected condition, and the veteran's own belief about cause was not treated as competent. (5 of 11 decisions read; e.g. 21018500, 21043277, 23056568)
• A reasoned VA opinion that reviewed the file and the veteran's account, often pointing to age or overuse, went unrebutted. (4 of 11 decisions read; e.g. 23050304, 21043277, 21018500)
• Many claims failed because there was no current hand diagnosis beyond what was already service connected. (5 of 11 decisions read; e.g. A24030851, A25000273, 24005196)

See the full answer, year by year →

Hand / fingers secondary to neck (cervical spine)

Secondary (caused or worsened by a service-connected condition)

Small sample: 22 decided cases, too few for a reliable percentage. 10 granted, 12 denied, 35 sent back to VA (remanded, not decided), 2 dismissed.

See the full answer, year by year →

Hand / fingers secondary to low back (lumbar spine)

Secondary (caused or worsened by a service-connected condition)

Small sample: 22 decided cases, too few for a reliable percentage. 4 granted, 18 denied, 32 sent back to VA (remanded, not decided), 1 dismissed.

See the full answer, year by year →

Hand / fingers secondary to wrist

Secondary (caused or worsened by a service-connected condition)

Small sample: 15 decided cases, too few for a reliable percentage. 9 granted, 6 denied, 22 sent back to VA (remanded, not decided), 2 dismissed.

See the full answer, year by year →

Hand / fingers secondary to diabetes

Secondary (caused or worsened by a service-connected condition)

Small sample: 12 decided cases, too few for a reliable percentage. 2 granted, 10 denied, 17 sent back to VA (remanded, not decided), 2 dismissed.

See the full answer, year by year →

Hand / fingers secondary to arthritis

Secondary (caused or worsened by a service-connected condition)

Small sample: 12 decided cases, too few for a reliable percentage. 0 granted, 12 denied, 1 sent back to VA (remanded, not decided), 0 dismissed.

See the full answer, year by year →

Hand / fingers secondary to the other hand / fingers

Secondary (caused or worsened by a service-connected condition)

Small sample: 10 decided cases, too few for a reliable percentage. 5 granted, 5 denied, 39 sent back to VA (remanded, not decided), 1 dismissed.

See the full answer, year by year →