How the Board ruled on arm and upper extremity claims, 2021–2025

Arm / upper extremity (direct service connection)

Direct (began in or was caused by service), or theory not stated in the Board order

27% granted of 967 decided cases (margin of error 24.3–29.9%). 261 granted, 706 denied, 1,613 sent back to VA (remanded, not decided), 196 dismissed.

What convinced the Board in granted cases

• The Board granted when a medical opinion with a clear rationale linked the arm condition to service or to a service-connected condition such as diabetes or a shoulder problem. (4 of 9 decisions read; e.g. 22053374, 21047721, 24007798)
• Negative VA opinions lost weight when they rested on a wrong factual premise, contradicted themselves, or addressed only a different theory than the one claimed. (3 of 9 decisions read; e.g. 21015441, 23050689, 22053374)
• Credible reports of an in-service injury and ongoing symptoms, backed by service records or statements from family and fellow service members, supported grants. (4 of 9 decisions read; e.g. A24007635, A25002768, 21066325)

Common reasons in denied cases

• Most denials found no current diagnosis, such as no upper-extremity neuropathy or radiculopathy on VA exams or in treatment records. (8 of 11 decisions read; e.g. 21022593, 21058095, A22015685)
• No medical opinion supported a link; the veteran's own view of diagnosis or cause was not competent, and the VA examiner's opinion was given more weight. (4 of 11 decisions read; e.g. A21001467, 23017928, 24004283)

See the full answer, year by year →

Arm / upper extremity secondary to any service-connected condition

Secondary (caused or worsened by a service-connected condition)

33.5% granted of 188 decided cases (margin of error 27.2–40.5%). 63 granted, 125 denied, 360 sent back to VA (remanded, not decided), 14 dismissed.

What convinced the Board in granted cases

• Grants often rested on a favorable VA examiner opinion with an adequate rationale, frequently tying arm nerve symptoms to a service-connected neck condition, with no contrary opinion. (3 of 7 decisions read; e.g. 22042891, 22017127, A25033959)
• Treatment records from VA and private providers linking arm nerve problems to a service-connected neck condition or diabetes, plus the veteran's credible symptom reports, supported grants. (3 of 7 decisions read; e.g. 22018733, 21053049, 23016366)
• Negative opinions did not end the claim when they lacked an adequate rationale, or were offset by medical literature showing diabetes raises the risk of arm nerve entrapment. (2 of 7 decisions read, few decisions; e.g. 22017127, 22054685)

Common reasons in denied cases

• The Board denied when a VA examiner reviewed the record and gave a reasoned opinion against a link, such as the problem sitting far from the service-connected joint, and nothing rebutted it. (4 of 10 decisions read; e.g. 22055101, 23028132, 21054483)
• Many claims failed because examinations and testing found no current diagnosed arm condition beyond what was already service connected. (5 of 10 decisions read; e.g. 21053557, 24020319, 21031746)
• The veteran's own statements were not competent to diagnose the arm condition or show its cause. (2 of 10 decisions read, few decisions; e.g. 21054483, 24020319)

See the full answer, year by year →

Arm / upper extremity secondary to neck (cervical spine)

Secondary (caused or worsened by a service-connected condition)

54.5% granted of 44 decided cases (margin of error 40.1–68.3%). 24 granted, 20 denied, 101 sent back to VA (remanded, not decided), 7 dismissed.

What convinced the Board in granted cases

• Once the neck condition was service-connected, the Board granted arm radiculopathy when VA or private medical evidence tied the arm nerve symptoms to cervical disc disease, sometimes citing medical literature. (6 of 12 decisions read; e.g. 22060586, A24034952, 22018733)
• Negative VA opinions lost weight when they rested on facts the record contradicted, or when normal nerve testing was relied on even though it cannot rule out some nerve damage. (2 of 12 decisions read, few decisions; e.g. 21009380, 23027391)
• Credible statements from the veteran, a spouse, or a buddy about ongoing neck and arm pain, tingling, and numbness supported the grants, especially when corroborated by medical records. (5 of 12 decisions read; e.g. 23027391, 22040936, 22060581)

Common reasons in denied cases

• The most common reason was that the neck condition itself was not service-connected, so arm symptoms caused by it could not be granted on a secondary basis. (5 of 12 decisions read; e.g. A25003147, 21010237, 22030974)
• There was no current diagnosis of arm radiculopathy or another arm disability, and the veteran's own belief was not enough to diagnose a nerve condition. (4 of 12 decisions read; e.g. A24031510, 23029854, 21072988)
• Detailed VA opinions went unrebutted, such as ones explaining that MRI showed no nerve root compression or that service records were silent for neck or arm injury. (2 of 12 decisions read, few decisions; e.g. A21007092, 21035442)

See the full answer, year by year →

Arm / upper extremity secondary to low back (lumbar spine)

Secondary (caused or worsened by a service-connected condition)

Small sample: 21 decided cases, too few for a reliable percentage. 4 granted, 17 denied, 50 sent back to VA (remanded, not decided), 0 dismissed.

See the full answer, year by year →

Arm / upper extremity secondary to diabetes

Secondary (caused or worsened by a service-connected condition)

Small sample: 13 decided cases, too few for a reliable percentage. 2 granted, 11 denied, 22 sent back to VA (remanded, not decided), 2 dismissed.

See the full answer, year by year →