Written by Dr. Ryan, DO · Updated September 28, 2026
Not sure if your GERD or digestive claim is worth pursuing?
Run your case against 295,756 actual BVA appeal decisions. 5 minutes. No payment. No obligation.
Free Viability Check →Barrett's esophagus is the condition VA raters and C&P examiners often overlook when evaluating GERD claims. If you have a GERD service connection and your endoscopy has ever shown Barrett's changes, a well-documented GERD nexus letter addressing those findings may support the significantly higher rating you could be entitled to.
Barrett's esophagus is a condition in which the normal squamous lining of the lower esophagus is replaced by intestinal-type columnar epithelium. This transformation (called intestinal metaplasia) is a direct consequence of chronic acid exposure. It does not develop without long-standing, significant reflux.
The clinical importance of Barrett's is twofold. First, it signals that your GERD has been severe enough and long enough to structurally change the esophageal tissue. Second, Barrett's carries a small but real risk of progression to esophageal adenocarcinoma, which is why gastroenterologists monitor it with scheduled surveillance endoscopies.
Since the VA revised its digestive rating schedule in 2024, Barrett's esophagus has its own diagnostic code, DC 7207 (38 CFR 4.114):
If malignancy develops, it is rated as a malignant neoplasm of the digestive system (DC 7343). If the Barrett's is resolved by surgery, radiofrequency ablation, or other treatment, the residuals are rated as esophageal stricture (DC 7203).
A stricture is part of how Barrett's (and GERD) is rated, not a separate add-on: with a stricture, DC 7207 sends the rating to DC 7203, and the same disability cannot be rated twice (38 CFR 4.14).
What moves a Barrett's rating is the pathology report (low-grade or high-grade dysplasia) and, when there is a stricture, how it is treated. A letter that simply states "the veteran has Barrett's esophagus" without the pathology findings, or without the stricture treatment history, leaves the rater without what the criteria ask for. The physician documenting the claim should cite the biopsy result and any dilatation or stent history explicitly.
If your Barrett's developed after service, you need a nexus connecting it either to service directly or to your service-connected GERD. The most common nexus theory is secondary service connection: your PTSD (or service-connected injury requiring NSAIDs) caused chronic GERD, and the chronic GERD caused Barrett's.
For the secondary theory to work, you need:
See GERD secondary to PTSD: the research-backed connection for the upstream nexus framework.
Some veterans have records of esophageal symptoms, endoscopies, or GI complaints during active duty. If your Barrett's was diagnosed in service, or if service records document severe reflux that was later found to have caused Barrett's changes, a direct service connection claim may be viable.
The challenge with direct service connection is that Barrett's rarely appears on deployment records. But significant GERD in the service record, combined with a post-service endoscopy showing Barrett's and a gastroenterologist's opinion linking the two, can be enough.
VA is obligated to provide surveillance endoscopies for service-connected Barrett's esophagus. Veterans sometimes struggle to get consistent monitoring within the VA system. If you're service-connected for Barrett's, document any gaps in surveillance in your records. Delayed diagnosis of dysplasia or adenocarcinoma because VA failed to schedule surveillance endoscopies could support an additional claim.
A C&P examiner reviewing a Barrett's claim should be evaluating:
If the examiner's report does not address complications or understates the severity, a well-written independent medical opinion can rebut the negative or inadequate C&P opinion.
Barrett's esophagus is a serious complication that deserves a serious evaluation. If your VA rating for GERD doesn't reflect the presence of Barrett's changes or associated stricture, a physician-signed IMO addressing the rating criteria directly may support a claim for increased rating. Flat Rate Nexus provides board-certified physician-authored opinions at flatratenexus.com.
Thinking about your own claim? Every nexus letter we write goes through a full physician record review, cites peer-reviewed research, and is built around the actual evidence in your case.
Start My Nexus Letter See pricing